Understanding the “why” behind anti-Wal-Mart

pic: defenderofthemiddleclass

The buy American campaigns you would believe are self-explanatory. Purchase American products, you are supporting American workers. Much has been written about Wal-Mart’s effect on American jobs, from short pieces to books and even documentaries. Unions have lobbied their members and families to shop elsewhere and despite all of the efforts, Wal-Mart is America’s largest retailer/employer. Is it too late to reverse this course and take back our economy and grow good jobs again? Understanding the “why” is important to building a lasting non-Wal-Mart mentality.

One of the better books on this is The Wal-Mart effect written by Charles Fishman. I read this book quite some time ago, sharing it with others when I was done. The book had many examples of Wal-Marts cut throat business practices to get the lowest price possible from suppliers. Wal-Mart would basically enter into a business relationship with the supplier of a product and over time become the suppliers largest customer. When the supplier’s existence relied on Wal-Mart as a customer, that was when Wal-Mart would demand a LOWER price from them. To stay in existence the supplier would be forced to lower costs. That supplier’s options would be investment in leaner manufacturing or cutting their expenses. What is the biggest expense of most businesses? LABOR: wages, benefits and its size.

The two most notable examples from The Wal-Mart effect, the Levi Strauss company and Vlasic pickles. Starting with Vlasic, they became a standalone company after Campbell Soup spun them off to focus on their core business. Vlasic, an American company purchased their ingredients from farms in the United States and manufactured here. Wal-Mart being their largest customer, demanded a low price on pickles for the gallon jar size Vlasic supplied them. The price was less-than $3.00 a gallon, leaving Vlasic with minimal profit. Vlasic’s options were none if they wanted their product in Wal-Mart as the price was a demand not a request. The effect of the pricing would spread to the rest of Vlasic’s customers as well. The >$3.00 a gallon for pickles at Wal-Mart driving down prices at the rest of the retailers who carried Vlasic. Other retailers will not carry for $5.00 a gallon when their competitor Wal-Mart sells for under $3.00 and a customer wouldn’t pay $5.00 would they? The obvious and factual result, NO they would not. Wal-Mart got their price from Vlasic and with their profit margins at the bare minimum, Vlasic went bankrupt to be bought by Pinnacle Foods who were later bought out. Lost to the American economy were important jobs along with the investments of the people who bought Vlasic stock when it went to ZERO.

Levi Strauss> the iconic jean maker who closed its last United States manufacturing operation located in San Antonio, Texas in 2003. After a decade of contraction in their sales they entered into a business relationship with Wal-Mart in the hopes of reviving their business. Supplying Wal-Mart with their own label of jeans called Signature. Wal-Mart instantly became Levi’s largest customer and all was well for the San Antonio manufacturing facility with their 800 employees. In what was Wal-Mart’s signature move, when it became time to renew the agreement, Wal-Mart demanded a lower price. The price lower than what Levi’s could produce them for at the Texas plant. In order to continue to sell to their biggest supplier WAL-MART and stay in business, Levi Strauss closed the Texas plant and shifted their production to countries with cheaper labor, 800 jobs lost.

What these two examples show us is that  looking for the AMERICAN MADE label is not enough. Where you purchase your products from is equally if not more important. The DEMAND side of economics is the driver of all the economy. So while we may be looking for the Made in American label for the cheapest price, shopping at Wal-Mart pretty much makes this a pointless endeavor. The examples of Vlasic and Levi Strauss tell us the true story and they are only two of many. Being a good corporate citizen means protecting the consumer directly and indirectly.

The “W” in Wal-Mart needs to stand for whirlpool! Enter into any relationship with Wal-Mart as a business or consumer, you will be drug down to the bottom. Isn’t that where the middle-class is? Or for a harsher reality, are we not headed to a two-class economy? We as consumers need to look at our purchasing habits not just for immediate gratification (savings) but what it will mean in the future. The bigger Wal-Mart becomes the more they will dictate to other businesses. Prices will be driven lower and with it jobs will be lost to whoever can produce them the cheapest. Wal-Mart is if not already become a monopoly, their power to control the American economy is handed to them by the people who walk through their doors. We control our future economic power, all we need to do is shop elsewhere.

buy the book at www.walmarteffectbook.com

Elections in Greece will result in a stock market move

image source: http://www.freakingnews.com

If we could accurately pick the results of todays elections in Greece, you would make plenty of money. The money to be made would be on the stock market. Your wager, or stock market buys would have been placed already or you would have already sold your positions. Much has been said by the “news networks” on the subject with the Fox network arguing to some degree that Greece’s economic condition has no impact on the American economy. It doesn’t less the stock market that is. Each time bad news comes out of Greece, the market drops and the business news networks are quick to point to the turmoil in Greece. Good news on their austerity deal with European lenders, the market goes up. Being a loser in the market, the little guy who panics on the bad news and sells on the way down. So prior to the markets opening on Monday, we will know the results of the elections in Greece without reading the results, when the powers of the stock market/before market trading has the market headng up or down.

The little guy, who has their retirement savings and maybe some of their investments for other needs in the market cannot panic. Panic is real lost money, that is hitting the sell button. What we all should have learned during the Great Recession is that panic kills the little guy and makes the big guy richer, the market does bounce back. If you are a short-term risk taker, your bets (stock buys) are already in, which might explain Fridays up day on the stock market. Come Monday’s market open the big money will have already been made or lost, our loss/gain will be the collateral effect.

When places like Fox report that Greece does not have any real effect on our economy they are right and wrong. Overall, Greece is a limited trading partner and does not, in the stock market they are wrong, which is still economics.

 

EQUAL PAY??? Not in the United States

Congress

image source: www.teambuildinginc.com

The Paycheck Fairness Act fell 7 votes short in the Senate today, blocking it from the Senate floor. The Republican opposition included Senate Leader Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) who believed a provision in the law would be a boon for trial lawyers. The provision would have allowed women to sue employers for punitive damages if they could show they were treated unfairly. The measure was opposed by business groups and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Fifty Democrats and two Independents supported the legislation.

As we can see from the numbers this was a partisan Republican effort and another clear sign from Republicans, that business comes first. The need for this legislation is obvious if you have listened each and every year how women are paid less than their male counterparts.

The battle for the woman vote or the perceived battle should be over after this Republican effort to keep women underpaid and give them no outlet for recourse. Who should women line up behind on election day? Well the old saying is “you vote your wallet.” With the Republican’s running the show, WOMEN WILL BE GUARANTEED TO BE SECOND-CLASS when it comes to providing for their families.

Facebook IPO, getting rich quick doesn’t happen for the little guy

facebook losses

image source: www.clusterflock.org

Get rich quick playing the stock market. If you were to have ever watched Jim Cramer’s Mad Money program and listened, you would have not got caught up in the Facebook hype. If you understand how the market works, selling on news, is often the general rule of thumb. When the news is not good, such as the Morgan Stanley revision of Facebook’s revenue forecasts the end result is a tanking stock. The stock market, is not much more than educated gambling and when the information put out or prospectus is flawed, we have losers big and small (ex: Citi’s $20 million Facebook loss).

The stock market is not built for “We the People”. Before the market trading and after the market trading, influences the price of a particular stock or fund so when “We the People” want to climb on board a buy or sell the boat has already set sail on the profit or loss. Trading opportunities on individual stocks takes plenty of work and research and if you do not have the time, energy or knowledge you will suffer losses more often than gains. Facebook’s IPO is a perfect example of how the stock market is a GAMBLE. By the time the little people got their shot, the stock was already pumped up. Before lunch, the stock reached $42.00, the rally was over and the DUMP WAS ON!  Jim Cramer had warned of this and he was spot on with his assessment. If you still hold the stock and you hope to recover some of your losses, you will be holding it for a long time, unless the little guy gets lucky in a lawsuit against Morgan Stanley and Facebook. Getting rich quick from the stock market, I like the odds better playing black on the roulette wheel. 

Poverty in New Jersey, record numbers that will get worse under Christie

image source www.copyright-free-images.com

What is poverty? The federal guidelines measure poverty as $22,050 for a family of four. For the single person, poverty is $10,830. When you read that New Jersey has 885,000 people living below the poverty line (Legal Services of New Jersey Poverty Research Institute), a record number, you have to wonder what is being done? Nothing, if you base it on the increase in numbers. In New Jersey the poverty rate stood at 8.7% in 2008 and in 2010, it was 10.3%.

The recession certainly has played a part in the increase and future numbers will increase when Governor Christie’s body of work impacts the next study. Under Christie, changes to the state-funded welfare system have denied thousands enrollment and reduced applications. A victory for the budget slashing governor who by reducing spending has been able to provide a tax relief for the millionaires of the state. The next move by Christie is on the table, a 10% across the board tax decrease that will do nothing for the 885,000 who are living in poverty, while lining the pockets for  guess who? His millionaire pals, who according to Christie were going to create jobs with the tax decrease.

In what has become a broken record in analyzing Christie’s performance, we are breaking records, POVERTY RECORDS! In what is clearly obvious by the numbers, unemployment, poverty and income tax receipts, Governor Christie has and continues to fail New Jersey’s people. If Christie is successful putting his weight behind the across the board tax decrease, remember it will come at a cost. The cost will be paid for by the working poor and the unemployed who live in poverty or for a better description, the unrepresented.

source: Philadelphia Inquirer 5/20/2012

Jobs that don’t require college, are they hiring?

unemployment

image source: marketmixup.com

The reality of getting a good job without a college education, MANY WILL BE FIGHTING FOR THE FEW. The economic downturn and the Republican Agenda of cutting secondary education monies, has many looking for jobs that simply do not exist. Looking to the web for ideas on a career path for the high school diploma holder, provides idea’s with little reality.

www.askmen.com has a posted article, 9 Jobs that don’t require a degree. The top three on their list, Firefighter, Police Officer and Mechanic. The article does date back to late 2011 but not much if anything has changed in the job market since this post. To dismiss the first two on the list, you can dismiss largely by geography and political affiliation. If your search has you in New Jersey, you have slim chance of getting hired anywhere in the fields of policing or firefighting. The state, led by Republican Chris Christie, has slashed funding to cities and towns resulting in lost employment. New Jersey is not alone in cutting back the public sector as this can also be seen elsewhere in the country and not limited to just the GOP run states.

The third job on the list mechanic, offers the most opportunity. For starters, it is not impacted by the harsh reality of politics. Secondly, with the economy struggling along, many are keeping their automobiles longer, resulting in more repairs. The on the job training through apprenticeship programs makes this field a winner for the highschool graduate.

Job’s, jobs and jobs, we need them and we need them now. Politics play a huge role in who’s hiring and who is not especially in the public sector. Your job future, if you go to college or not will be impacted by the policies of the people we elect. This statement can be quantified by the list of jobs suggested by the post on www.askmen.com . Taking politics out of the equation, they hit a home run with their suggestions. With politics, “who’s on first?”

 

New Jersey’s Homestead Rebate, don’t qualify? THANKS for the form

executive order

image source: www.nowpublic.com

Governor Christie’s war on wasteful spending or at least what he views as waste, education, workers benefits, property tax rebates, etc, has missed the obvious. Late last week I received the unexpected, a Homestead Rebate application. Why was it unexpected? Because I do not qualify for the rebate and haven’t for quite a few years now. Since the limit for the under sixty-five was reduced to $75,000, I have not been mailed an application.  After receiving this years application, I opened it expecting to see something different. I WAS DISAPPOINTED AND I MUST SAY, THANKS CHUBBY!

In the application, it states the income limits, the same as in previous years, with one difference. The difference being a glimpse of delusion. Stating that even if you do not qualify, fill it out anyway in case something changes in the states 2013 budget. You will be rejected, but fill it out anyway. Does this mean that in 2013 Governor Hamburger will finally live up to his campaign promise of reducing property taxes? Or that he will finally give a crap about someone other than his millionaire pals? I think I know the answers to those questions, so all that is left is he will be leaving New Jersey to become Vice President or all those twinkies he is eating will do him in. Now I AM DELUSIONAL!

What I am left with is the one word question, WHY? Why would you waste the money to send me something that you know I do not qualify for? Why would you waste the time of some state worker to process the NO, that was already disclosed in my state tax return? This is called waste Governor Hamburger! It might not add up to much, but it is waste none-the-less. Couldn’t the state use the information they already have, save the money and put it to better use? Maybe on one of those wasteful programs you cut, like EDUCATION.

Love for Governor Christie?

gov.christie

image source:www.leighvalleylive.com

Governor Christie is not looking to be loved. That was the statement from the Hamburger, when he spoke at the biannual dinner of Washington’s Cato Institute on Friday. The statement was in reference to making the tough choices in cutting New Jersey’s budget. The budget cuts in New Jersey have hit the majority the hardest and the minority the least. Hamburgers cuts, have been to veteran programs, education, public workers benefits, police and pretty much everything that is non-millionaire.

Governor Hamburger has found “LOVE”, in the people that he represents, the millionaire. Which was and continues to be the focus of his administration. The tax-cut of 10% which he has proposed and noted at the Cato dinner, is a continuation of his millionaire trickle down economics that has produced ZERO job creation for the state.

“…our democracy and our markets, work better than any other system” What and who are you referring to Governor? The state has 9% unemployment, less tax collections and we are heading to the second major tax-break for millionaires under your reign. At least we can say, that you are not fickle, you have stayed in bed with the same group from the beginning, the minority millionaire. This could be what makes you qualified to be Vice President. Your record on jobs can’t possibly be an asset.

source: abcnews.com

Romney spinning a tale of family poverty?

Romney gets endorsements

image source: www.rightspeak.net

Gearing up for battle with President Obama, Mitt Romney is out attempting to put some distance between himself and his wealth. Speaking Sunday in Greencastle, Pa he discussed his family’s lack of wealth in the past. “My dad’s DAD went broke more than once.” So Romney is discussing not being of third generation wealth. This is his attempt at distancing himself from money? His grandfather, is what makes him relatable to the average American?

Gaskell Romney, was a carpenter who lived in a Mormon colony in Mexico, where Mitt Romney’s father was born. In the book “The Real Romney”, the family was wealthy until the Mexican revolution, the Romney’s fled back to America losing most of their money. Mitt’s father George was five at the time. After some time in the United States, Gaskell found wealth again in Utah as a carpenter. Again, hardship hit the Romney’s during the great depression and the family lost their wealth. George Romney was quoted in the book “The Real Romney” regarding his father Gaskell during the depression, “He never took out bankruptcy, which he could have done several times.”

So we have some background on the poverty and we should understand why Mitt Romney is attempting to get distance from his wealth. To address the quote in the book from George Romney “he never took out bankruptcy..” Bankruptcy law was first established in the United States by the 1898 Bankruptcy Act. The law dealt with corporations and personal bankruptcy law was weak, according to a 2006 article by the St.Louis Federal Reserve. Personal bankruptcies were strengthened by The Chandler Act in 1938. The quote, implies that Gaskell did something out of the ordinary by not seeking bankruptcy. In fact during the period of the Great Depression, the laws were weak and bankruptcies ran at about 0.15 per 1000 people. Gaskell Romney, did nothing more than most Americans had done in their time.

Framing Romney as a RICH GUY, is an accurate frame.Romney’s attempt at shedding the label of RICH GUY, quantifies he is out of touch with the rest of us. MY GRANDFATHER WAS POOR, SO I UNDERSTAND POVERTY!  What else can possibly be said? Romney needs to move on to another subject where he has a shot at coming off believable.

Sources: http://yahoo.com/millionaire-romney-says-grandfather-wasnt-one-024810574.html

http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/br/articles/?id=563 100 years of bankruptcy

 

 

Banking rules, that make zero sense, unless you are the bank

banking rules for young savers

pic: defenderofthemiddleclass.com

The thrill of a child getting a job, is the potential of a few less times they ask you for money. What they spend that money on and deem a necessity is a different story. Never the less, it does reduce the amount of times they have their hands out looking for some money. With that new job and paycheck, you would think having access to the banking industry like an adult would be part of that. Well, if you aren’t of legal adult age (18), think again.

The “young saver account” or whatever your bank calls it, is for those under 18. The account needs a parent/guardian on the account, meaning the “young saver” has limited access to THEIR MONEY. “Young savers”, can deposit their paycheck, but cannot take money from the paycheck. Here is where the zero sense of the banking rule starts and does become more ridiculous. The “young saver”, can get a ATM card and now have access to their money, without a parent/guardian. Only for the mere cost of the ATM fee. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have an issue with the ATM access, I have an issue with the whole idea that they can’t get the money when depositing their check. Obviously, the rules vary from state to state and bank to bank, making research very important in your decision-making process.

The limitations on a young saver seems to focus in theory on the word saver. If the title lived up to what actually occurs, I could get on board with it. What we do have is another example of big banks cashing in on the rules. Allowing access to ATM’s and collecting their FEE, while not allowing cash back on a deposit makes no sense for the young consumer. It is an opportunity for the bank to dig into the “young savers” pocket and rip them off.

The establishment of rules surrounding banking and minors was for the protection of them. What we have in the end, is the rules being avoided and the banks profiting from them. The teachable lesson? I’m still trying to explain why the government is taking taxes and medicare from the check.

 

Sunoco’s closure of Philly refinery, lost jobs, higher gas prices and bigger profits

North East refinery closures

image source: www.laprogressive.com

The closure of Sunoco’s Philadelphia refinery, is getting closer and the region is getting worried. News reports suggest the area economy will have a loss of jobs upward to 36 thousand ( including previous refinery closures). Along with those lost jobs, tax revenue will decline, putting the city and state under further economic pressure. Sunoco who does have the refinery up for sale, has yet to find a buyer or get any offers.

The bottom line is, the OIL companies are here to make a profit, which Sunoco was not in Philly. Sunoco, has stated that the refinery had lost nearly a billion dollars over the last three years. If you were to suggest that EPA rules or more pipeline approvals would have changed Philly’s fate, think again. Philly is outdated and has not had any real capital investment/improvements over many years. It is no longer efficient and that is by Sunoco’s choice. The reduced consumer demand over the past few years, has also impacted profits.

The much repeated theme by the politicians this presidential election cycle has been drill, drill, drill, to lower prices at the pumps and create jobs. If we were to drill, drill, drill, where would we refine it for our consumption? The GOP, will come out with tax break ideas for the oil companies and attempt to protect them as job producers. This regional example of what big oil can do, is the argument against the lies. Now if the government/GOP wanted to offer subsidies to continue to keep these refineries open and produce more gasoline, driving down the price at the pump, now that deserves some talk.  Oh yeah, the GOP won’t do that, that isn’t capitalism and it’s more big government. It will also hurt their chances this fall, $5.00 a gallon gas, is the GOP OBJECTIVE, that will help in getting their candidate, Romney in the White House. When it is all over, one thing is for certain, the OIL COMPANIES will make huge profits! The reduction in refining, will guarantee the supply is low.

No women allowed, it is free enterprise says Fox broad Andrea Tantaros

no women allowed

image source: lazysmash.com

Very few people in this nation will ever get the chance to become members at Augusta National Golf Club, home of the Masters. In fact, only about 300 members get the “honor” of membership. Recognizable names such as, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett call Augusta, their home club. Augusta’s policy of “NO WOMEN ALLOWED”, means very little in the end to most of us, unless you are curious about opinions. The recent unrest in regard to Augusta’s policy has infiltrated the campaign trail. President Obama and GOP Candidate Mitt Romney both were asked if women should be allowed in Augusta. Both took the position or took the high road with YES, WOMEN SHOULD BE ALLOWED. With taking a position on Augusta’s ban on women, it is now political and worthy of Fox spin.

The Five, a Fox News program with “five experts”, strategically positioned around a table (based on skirt length for the camera), giving views on current events. Yesterday’s program covered briefly Augusta’s ban on women and the position President Obama had taken on the subject. Romney, who is a Republican was mentioned but largely given a pass ( no surprise). After a bit of debate and position taking by four of the “FIVE”, out comes the irresponsible position of  Andrea Tantaros ( to be noted she’s positioned in her short skirt front right). “Private enterprise should be allowed to use any business model they like”. Basically, we have not much to interpret, Tantaros believes discrimination is a non-issue if it gets in the way of free enterprise. To accept this as being okay from here to the end of this post, we will refer to Tantaros as the FOX BROAD.

supports augusta ban on women

image source: tvnewscaps.maxforum.org

If free enterprise trumps all, would the FOX BROAD, have the opportunity to speak her GOP propaganda? As stated in her Fox bio, would she be working as a columnist for the New York Daily News? The FOX BROAD, if living in the discriminating times she promotes ,would not have had the opportunity to attend Leigh University. I will assume that the FOX BROAD graduated and with that degree, has worked in communications for Fortune 500 corporations, on Capitol Hill and in numerous campaigns. The FOX BROAD, has benefited from the change that has occurred in our society towards discriminating against women.

We could call it hypocrisy, but I do not think it is appropriate in this case. What we have, could be a combination of many variables. The first variable, the FOX BROAD, is not old enough to know real discrimination. The second variable, she is only allowed to voice the far-right view of FOX and not hers. (which would not make the show a news show, but we aren’t discussing that) The third variable, the FOX BROAD doesn’t care about any real position, she is there for self promotion and a paycheck. (This would explain the cross leg, short skirt profile pose for the camera.)

To wrap up the two issues at hand, the first being Augusta’s ban on women. Augusta could easily end the stupid 1933 policy of no women and continue to discriminate, based off of “other criteria”, one being net worth. With members such as Gates and Buffett, their tiny community of 300 is not likely to be infiltrated by any of the riff-raff. So, change your stupid discriminating ban on women and continue to discriminate by wealth and status.

The second issue  FOX BROAD Andrea Tantaros, if you truly believe/understand discrimination is ok, get off the air. Get in the kitchen cook and bake. Keep a nice neat home and keep yourself knocked up. YES, barefoot and pregnant. Your party promoting “opinions” are disgusting and not consistent with your success. Then again, maybe your just there for some other reason and not your opinion. I heard you though and your opinion STINKS! 

 

A penny for your thoughts, a bargain for now

Canada gets rid of penny

pic: defenderofthemiddleclass.com

“A penny for your thoughts”, soon to cost more in Canada after their government eliminated the future production of the penny. The penny in the United States seems safe for now, despite it being an economic failure. Is the penny worth keeping as a denomination?

Last year, the U.S.Mint produced 4.9 billion pennies at a cost of $118 million . That comes to 2.4 cents per penny, not exactly a positive argument to keep making them. Proponents for the penny, believe the elimination of the penny would put further pressure on our fragile economy. Rounding prices higher would obviously impact the poor of our country negatively which is not a desired result, but what is the alternative?

The penny is primarily made of zinc and that’s a big reason the penny costs 2.4 cents. What alternative metal can be used to drive down costs? Better yet, do we need to make the penny out of metal? How about making it out of plastic recycled from water bottles? No disrespect to Abe Lincoln, but the penny does get more than its fair share of disrespect now.  The sign above the change hopper leaving the N.J. Turnpike, “no pennies please”. Vending machines do not accept pennies and when you go shopping, there is the little container, have a penny, take a penny”. Forget about attempting to count the times, you might have seen a penny on the ground.

So, it will have a negative impact on the economy, raising prices. We value the penny so much that we throw it on the ground, give them away to strangers and can’t spend them everywhere. We spend more than double the value to make them. But we like them! To keep them we need to “change”.

My vote is for the plastic penny, made from recycled water bottles. They will last longer, cost less and recycling will make Al Gore happy. I wonder, if there is room on the penny to put a warning, don’t leave exposed to sun, they could melt. I guess that would be unnecessary, after all its just a penny.

 

Student Debt Relief Now: A Rebuttal

Here, I offer a rebuttal, in the spirit of democratic conversation, to the article “Bailouts, Bailouts, Bailouts! Many Want One, But is it Deserved?”. In the article, the author argues that student loans should not be bailed out. I disagree with this stance. Student debt is a major up-and-coming crisis. It has even been considered the next bubble to burst. Indeed, we are looking at the potential destruction of the entire higher education system in America in the upcoming decades. With students leaving college with more debt than they can ever hope to repay before they turn 40, the situation is dire. How is one supposed to get anywhere in life when one starts $140,000 in debt? And there are no jobs to absorb the graduate population to boot. Student debt has surpassed credit card debt in the United States. This is a disaster waiting to happen. A simple “they know what they were getting into” argument, respectfully, does not hold water.

First of all, the argument against debt forgiveness is based on the assumption that college is a free choice. It assumes that a potential student begins to shop around the marketplace of colleges, looking for the best quality for the least cost. Therefore, if one decides on an expensive college, it is their fault that they cannot pay back their loans. Yet, what happens if they all are too expensive? What then? Does one just simply not go to college? Is that really an option in modern day America, where even the slightest chance of one making something of themselves is hinged upon having a college degree? The reality is, students have little choice but to go to college and pay whatever ridiculous rate is charged. The alternative is a lifelong job at Wal-Mart (which cannot pay the bills).

This is the closest thing to a hostage situation I can think of. The social, political, personal, and economic imperatives all weigh down on the youth of America to the point that it is nearly impossible not to go to college. This means they are forced to pay whatever price is thrown at them. This cost has increased exponentially over the past 4 decades, through no fault of the students. In fact, part of the reason why college is so expensive is the legacy of Reagan and the Republican Party. So much federal and state funding has been cut off from colleges, forcing them to consistently increase tuition. Meanwhile, the Republicans (along with their Democratic buddies) have slashed away at student aid programs, all in the name of forcing students into the hands of the private loan industry. Interest rates alone are enough to make you sick. There was time when usury was considered a sin…that time has long since passed. Students have become prey for corporate greed. The youth now face the prospect of being in debt to the rich for the rest of their adult lives. Maybe, if they’re lucky, they will be free from this prison just in time to retire.

The fact is, students have had no say in this. In the past, the government has provided ample funding for students to go to school (e.g. The G.I. Bill). For those who didn’t get public assistance, tuition was low enough that it could be paid off by an individual working a low wage job. Now, it is unthinkable that someone working at a Wal-Mart, Target, Staples, you name it, could ever afford to pay their way through college. Meanwhile the top 1% get to skim off the top of the crushing, usurious loans students are forced to take out. When one faces the reality of the situation, it is hard to come to the conclusion that students “knew what they were getting into” and ought to be held responsible.

Indeed, all the way back to the founding fathers, it was believed that education was a non-negotiable necessity. Education is not a privilege, at least it ought not be. For so many students the choice is “low wage, service sector jobs” or to take on massive debt in order to at least have a fighting chance in this world. This doesn’t seem like much of a choice to me. When the alternative is to be a perpetual member of America’s underclass (especially since there are hardly any manufacturing jobs left), does one really have the choice not to go to college? I didn’t even mention the social stigma attached to those who don’t go, and social pressure is a very power force. So, in the end, students are forced to sell themselves to the 1% in order to not be at the very bottom of the barrel. This is slavery.

The only immediate relief is student debt forgiveness. When society recognizes that students neither asked for, created, nor can they handle student debt, it becomes clear that it is in the best interest of society to relieve this crushing burden. Sure, those who are making their fortunes off of the impossible situation the youth find themselves in will be hurt by this. But I feel no sympathy. If we want to have any type of productive future, having future generations starting with such a handicap is no way to achieve it (especially since the rich, who were able to afford their education upfront, will become the leaders of society while those who are of middle and working class origin will, once again, be at their mercy). It is also worth pointing out that student debt does not have a bankruptcy option. Students are stuck with their debt for life, whether they can pay it or not. Also, most loans require payments to begin within 6 months of graduation.

This situation is unsustainable. We need to recognize that education is an added value to all of society. Therefore, society should shoulder the burden. I, personally, believe college should be free or heavily subsidized (like it is in many European countries). But until that is in the works, the least we can do, in the name of our future, is attempt to relieve the burden on the future generation of America. The fact is, most students are incapable of repaying their loans, even if they wanted to. Is this the result of greedy kids making irrational decisions? Or is it the result of students being the victims of structural conditions outside of their control? I say it’s the latter. We need student debt relief now.  Otherwise, we are looking at an extremely dark future.

Bailouts,Bailouts,BAILOUTS! many want one, but is it deserved?

loan forgiveness

image source: www.flickr.com

Bailouts, this has become one of the most overused words in the past few years. We have the AUTO BAILOUT, THE BANKING BAILOUT, THE MORTGAGE BAILOUT, along with the countless businesses, who have latched on to the idea to promote their business. We all could use one, but would it be deserved?

Tuesday, I had the opportunity to listen to Green Party Candidate, Dr. Jill Stein speak in Philadelphia. I covered her campaign message in a previous post, staying for the most part away from any real opinion on her platform. Honestly, I liked much of what she had to say, with the exception of her position on student loans. Dr. Stein, touched on the issue briefly stating that “if elected she would forgive student loans”. Her belief being that the huge student loan debt is effecting the economy adversely and has a stranglehold on young adults. While I do agree that the debt is hurting the economy and young adults, what she is suggesting is a bailout. Dr. Stein did not use the word bailout, that is my interpretation.

The suggestion of forgiving student loans, is an idea which is not just Dr. Steins. It has been discussed in the world of liberals, being nothing more than just talk. Is forgiving student loans the right move? What about the many others who have paid for their educations?

Having a child in college, I know all about the cost. I have been lucky as my student has received some scholarship money, the significant remainder of the bill, I have paid. Coming up to the last year of school for my student, the well is dry. With this said, if we forgive loans, is the next step to reimburse me for my students expense? I know the answer to that question, it is no. I am perfectly okay with that answer, which takes me back to the original question, should the loans be forgiven? The answer to that, should be no. College education is not a right it is a privilege. Money, determines where and if a person can even go. Loans are a reality of this process for many and every student/parent realizes this when they enroll. If you take on the loan obligation for college, your terms are clear. You are accepting the money to be used for your education and have agreed to pay these monies back with interest. The economy and a guarantee of a job when you graduate, does not exist.

If the economy was robust and we had jobs, loan forgiveness would not be an issue. The economy didn’t go as planned, so let’s go backwards, is what student loan forgiveness is.This statement could apply to any other bailout as well. Of coarse, the effect of each bailout on the future of our economy certainly would be different. College is not a right and each student who takes on a loan to go to college knows what they are getting into. If we are going to do anything, we should be addressing the future. Reducing the cost of college to make it more affordable is the right path. The past is something to learn from and the future is what we are looking to improve. I do realize this is not a popular liberal position.